FINAXIONResearch
Finaxion Research · “Sell in May and go away” · single stocks · Recomputed 2026-09-10

Does “Sell in May and go away” work on MRVL?

“Sell in May and go away” does not beat buy-and-hold on MRVL: -0.9 points a year over 26 years.

Total return
×14
Buy and hold
×17
CAGR
10.6%
Sharpe
0.45
Max drawdown
-84.7%
Trades
52
Out of sample
—
Years
26
1×10×2001200320052007200920112013201520172019202120232025
StrategyMRVL

Findings

  1. “Sell in May and go away” does not beat buy-and-hold on MRVL: -0.9 points a year over 26 years.
  2. Against the S&P 500 over the same window: +2.2 points a year.
  3. Total return ×14 versus ×17 for buy-and-hold, with 52 trades.
  4. Maximum drawdown -84.7%.
  5. It beat before 2013 and stopped afterwards.
  6. It ranks #45 of 232 markets for this strategy by annual excess over the S&P 500.

Findings derived from the full panel. Each carries its number and its denominator; the computations are reproducible with artifact 0b534dd04389.

Exactly what was tested

Long from the first trading day of November to the last of April; cash from May to October. Calendar rules: simulated with our seasonal engine, same costs as everything else.

How to read it

The verdict compares the strategy with buying and holding MRVL over the same window, with round-trip costs per asset class. “Out of sample” is walk-forward: the rule is fit on one stretch and judged on the next. A result that beats in the full sample but not out of it is overfit. Full methodology in the protocol. How we test.

Open this backtest with its trades   Trades (CSV)

Every strategy on MRVL → · Full page for “Sell in May and go away” →

How to cite

Finaxion Research (2026). Does “Sell in May and go away” work on MRVL?. Daily backtest 1962-01-01–2026-08-31, artifact 0b534dd04389. https://finaxion.app/en/research/sell-in-may/mrvl

Not a recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future results.