FINAXIONResearch
Finaxion Research · Wyckoff: buying the accumulation · single stocks · Recomputed 2026-09-10

Does Wyckoff: buying the accumulation work on FTNT?

Wyckoff: buying the accumulation does not beat buy-and-hold on FTNT: -19.3 points a year over 17 years.

Total return
615.4%
Buy and hold
×103
CAGR
12.5%
Sharpe
0.42
Max drawdown
-53.1%
Trades
95
Out of sample
—
Years
17
1×10×100×201020122014201620182020202220242026
StrategyFTNT

Findings

  1. Wyckoff: buying the accumulation does not beat buy-and-hold on FTNT: -19.3 points a year over 17 years.
  2. Against the S&P 500 over the same window: -1.7 points a year.
  3. Total return +615.4% versus ×103 for buy-and-hold, with 95 trades.
  4. Maximum drawdown -53.1%.
  5. It beats in neither half of the history (split at 2018).
  6. It ranks #44 of 227 markets for this strategy by annual excess over the S&P 500.

Findings derived from the full panel. Each carries its number and its denominator; the computations are reproducible with artifact 11e887f77aa5.

Exactly what was tested

Mechanical approximation: 20-bar range with an 8-bar test window; active accumulation state → long; state lost → flat.

How to read it

The verdict compares the strategy with buying and holding FTNT over the same window, with round-trip costs per asset class. “Out of sample” is walk-forward: the rule is fit on one stretch and judged on the next. A result that beats in the full sample but not out of it is overfit. Full methodology in the protocol. How we test.

Open this backtest with its trades   Trades (CSV)

Every strategy on FTNT → · Full page for Wyckoff: buying the accumulation →

How to cite

Finaxion Research (2026). Does Wyckoff: buying the accumulation work on FTNT?. Daily backtest 1962-01-01–2026-08-31, artifact 11e887f77aa5. https://finaxion.app/en/research/wyckoff-accumulation/ftnt

Not a recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future results.