FINAXIONResearch
Finaxion Research · Wyckoff: buying the accumulation · single stocks · Recomputed 2026-09-10

Does Wyckoff: buying the accumulation work on LVS?

Wyckoff: buying the accumulation does not beat buy-and-hold on LVS: -8.0 points a year over 22 years.

Total return
-74.2%
Buy and hold
50.3%
CAGR
-6.1%
Sharpe
-0.20
Max drawdown
-92.4%
Trades
130
Out of sample
overfit
Years
22
0.1×1×20052007200920112013201520172019202120232025
StrategyLVS

Findings

  1. Wyckoff: buying the accumulation does not beat buy-and-hold on LVS: -8.0 points a year over 22 years.
  2. Against the S&P 500 over the same window: -17.0 points a year.
  3. Total return -74.2% versus +50.3% for buy-and-hold, with 130 trades.
  4. The result does not hold out of sample: it is overfit.
  5. Maximum drawdown -92.4%.
  6. It did not beat before 2015 and started afterwards.
  7. It ranks #225 of 227 markets for this strategy by annual excess over the S&P 500.

Findings derived from the full panel. Each carries its number and its denominator; the computations are reproducible with artifact 11e887f77aa5.

Exactly what was tested

Mechanical approximation: 20-bar range with an 8-bar test window; active accumulation state → long; state lost → flat.

How to read it

The verdict compares the strategy with buying and holding LVS over the same window, with round-trip costs per asset class. “Out of sample” is walk-forward: the rule is fit on one stretch and judged on the next. A result that beats in the full sample but not out of it is overfit. Full methodology in the protocol. How we test.

Open this backtest with its trades   Trades (CSV)

Every strategy on LVS → · Full page for Wyckoff: buying the accumulation →

How to cite

Finaxion Research (2026). Does Wyckoff: buying the accumulation work on LVS?. Daily backtest 1962-01-01–2026-08-31, artifact 11e887f77aa5. https://finaxion.app/en/research/wyckoff-accumulation/lvs

Not a recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future results.